Magnesium Aspartate vs Magnesium Lactate
How magnesium aspartate and magnesium lactate differ in elemental content, absorption, tolerance, and cost.
This page contains affiliate links. Titrate earns a small commission when you purchase through them, at no cost to you. This does not affect our recommendations.
Side by Side
| Magnesium Aspartate | Magnesium Lactate | |
|---|---|---|
| Elemental content | Varies by product | 12% elemental magnesium |
| Absorption | High | High |
| How it is absorbed | Soluble organic salt. Absorption was equivalent to chloride and lactate in Firoz and Graber 2001. | Soluble organic salt. Absorption was equivalent to chloride and aspartate in Firoz and Graber 2001. |
| Typical dose | 100-350 mg elemental magnesium daily | 100-350 mg elemental magnesium daily |
| Common uses | general repletion, multi-mineral formulas | sensitive stomachs, sustained-release formulas |
| Side effects | Mild osmotic effect at higher doses. | Among the gentlest forms on the gut. |
| Cost | Moderate | Moderate |
| Also called | magnesium L-aspartate | magnesium L-lactate dihydrate |
| Labels in index | 585 | 12 |
When to Choose Magnesium Aspartate
Choose magnesium aspartate when it comes in a formula you already want. It offers no distinct advantage over citrate. About 8.4% elemental as the anhydrous salt and lower as the hydrates sold commercially, so the panel figure is the one to use. Common in combination formulas with potassium aspartate.
Magnesium Aspartate
Choose magnesium aspartate when it comes in a formula you already want. It offers no distinct advantage over citrate.
What to look for: Magnesium Aspartate named on the Supplement Facts panel, with the amount per serving stated.
Find on iHerb Affiliate linkWhen to Choose Magnesium Lactate
Choose magnesium lactate when you want a gentle, well-absorbed form in a sustained-release product. The dihydrate common in products is about 10.2% elemental.
Magnesium Lactate
Choose magnesium lactate when you want a gentle, well-absorbed form in a sustained-release product.
What to look for: Magnesium Lactate named on the Supplement Facts panel, with the amount per serving stated.
Find on iHerb Affiliate linkProducts on Titrate
In Titrate's index of NIH label data, 585 labels in the Magnesium category list magnesium aspartate and 12 list magnesium lactate.
Supplement Search loads one category at a time. Choose the Magnesium tab, then type a form such as "bisglycinate" under Must contain, or a form to avoid under Must not contain.
Related
- Magnesium supplement guide
- Magnesium Form Comparison
- Electrolyte Needs
- Magnesium Aspartate vs Magnesium Citrate
- Magnesium Aspartate vs Magnesium Glycinate
- Magnesium Aspartate vs Magnesium Malate
- Magnesium Aspartate vs Magnesium L-Threonate
- Magnesium Citrate vs Magnesium Lactate
- Magnesium Glycinate vs Magnesium Lactate
- All form comparisons
References
NIH Office of Dietary Supplements. Magnesium: Fact Sheet for Health Professionals.
Firoz M, Graber M. Bioavailability of US commercial magnesium preparations. Magnes Res. 2001;14(4):257-262.
Kappeler D, et al. Higher bioavailability of magnesium citrate as compared to magnesium oxide shown by evaluation of urinary excretion and serum levels after single-dose administration in a randomized cross-over study. BMC Nutr. 2017;3:7.
Pardo MR, et al. Bioavailability of magnesium food supplements: A systematic review. Nutrition. 2021;89:111294.
Zhang X, et al. Effects of Magnesium Supplementation on Blood Pressure: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trials. Hypertension. 2016;68(2):324-333.
Holland S, et al. Evidence-based guideline update: NSAIDs and other complementary treatments for episodic migraine prevention in adults. Neurology. 2012;78(17):1346-1353.
Garrison SR, et al. Magnesium for skeletal muscle cramps. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;9(9):CD009402.
Liu G, et al. Efficacy and Safety of MMFS-01, a Synapse Density Enhancer, for Treating Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. J Alzheimers Dis. 2016;49(4):971-990.